There are new political rules created by Republicans over how U.S. Supreme Court nominees get their seats, and those rules dictate that every single Democrat in the Senate vote against the nomination of Neil Gorsuch, a right-wing extremist in what the media is calling the mold of the late Antonin Scalia.

Now is not a time for Democratic appeasement. If another deeply conservative judge joins the Supreme Court, then much falls into jeopardy, from Roe v. Wade to same-sex marriage to racial equality. Every act taken by Trump and his surrogates will be sanctioned by the nation’s highest court.

In essence, if Gorsuch makes it onto the court, Trump will conceivably own all three branches of government, and, believe me, I use the word “own” quite intentionally.

This is absolute: If any Democratic U.S. Senator so much as even considers voting for this radical judge nominated by an unhinged, authoritarian and lying president, then they need to face protests and then a vote out of office when the time comes if we still have a real vote at that time.

The nominee needs 60 votes to get his position. There are 52 Republican, 46 Democratic and two independent Senators. Obviously, the Republicans can change the 60-vote rule because of their majority, but that doesn’t mean Democrats shouldn’t stand up for the sake of their country.

(Click "Read more" to continue reading.)


The Oklahoman Does Not Seize The Day

Democracy and freedom of speech in this country are on the line because of an autocratic and unhinged newly-elected president, but The Oklahoman editorial board, for now, can only see the issue as a lack of his personal discipline.

Of course, Oklahoma is Donald Trump country, helped along to be so through the years by the right-wing newspaper and a consistently low college graduation rate. So any real criticism of Trump isn’t to be expected or maybe even sought after from the newspaper’s editorial writers. Still, one wonders at what point does the newspaper on its editorial page tell the truth about Trump? Never? Most likely.

In an Sunday editorial titled “Trump's stream-of-consciousness approach appears to be here to stay,” the newspaper is somewhat critical of the new president’s “approach” but fails to address just what that approach portends for our country’s democratic structures. The editorial lauded Trump for speaking to CIA employees for some reason and for approving the controversial Dakota Access pipeline and the Keystone XL pipeline least week for obvious reasons, but then also mentioned Trump’s fixation with himself and his unsubstantiated statements that 3 to 5 million illegal immigrants voted in the election and that’s why he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.

The newspaper doesn’t even mention the Trump administration’s order to clamp down on freedom of speech among federal employees or a Trump surrogate’s interview in The New York Times, suggesting the newspaper and other media outlets critical of Trump should just “shut up.” One might reasonably think even The Oklahoman, which purports to be a news organization, would be concerned about this issue in particular. The editorial doesn’t address Trump’s draconian and most likely illegal order to stop people from a handful of Muslim countries from coming to the U.S.

(Click "Read more" to continue reading.)


Threat To U.S. Democracy Is Now Very Real

(“The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for awhile”—Steve Bannon, official chief Trump propagandist.)

President Donald Trump’s erratic behavior during his first few days in office have only confirmed fears the country is devolving into a neofascist state governed by an unhinged yet calculating, lying authoritarian leader.

For me to go over the bucket list of Trump’s political moves and rambling utterances—some of which are entirely disconnected from reality—during his first week as president serves no useful purpose in terms of the resistance to the emerging fascism, at least as I see it. It’s Trump’s strategy to flood the field with bizarre, outlandish claims and now shifting presidential edicts, which fragments what could be an unified response to the nightmare that is upon us.

One group focuses on his lie and juvenile fixation about how he actually won the popular vote in November over Hillary Clinton. Others deal with his threats against sanctuary cities and immigrants. Another organization deals with Trump’s obvious disdain for reproductive rights for women. Yet other people focus on Trump’s lack of interest in preserving LGBT rights, let alone advancing them. People, and rightly so, deal minutely with Trump’s intended unraveling of our health care system and what it will mean. We’re too busy keeping up instead of speaking up.

As Trump might put it himself, he wins identity politics the greatest ever. How we define ourselves politically and personally is vastly important as is the embrace of the plethora of individuals and groups that, in the past, has made our country stand out among nations. But our country’s history, one that includes the government’s attempted genocide of indigenous people, slavery and racial discrimination tells the nation’s darker hateful and violent side, one that shouldn’t be forgotten as Trump attempts to degrade and fragment his opposition. It will not be one person—though leaders will emerge—or one group that will create a successful resistance to this new and very real chapter of American horror.

It will, perhaps to state the obvious, take the unification of different stakeholders in the progressive movement for any successful response to Trump. Whenever we’re mocked in the media or by the GOP for our disparate concerns with mantras like “those crazy protestors are all over the place” know that this is our strength just as long as we remain committed to the overall cause of resisting fascism. We can’t forget the larger goal as we express our identities and individual concerns.

As a part of remaining focused, I want to address only three issues that emerged during Trump’s first week. Those issues are (1) his lies about how he won the popular vote, (2) his clamping down on freedom of speech and (3) the information, questions and arguments that have emerged about Trump’s mental stability. Viewed as a pattern, these issues should terrify any rational person.

(Click "Read more" to continue reading.)