Rice

(Can Oklahoma meet the sustainability challenge it will face in coming years? Read DocHoc's commentary this week in Oklahoma City's finest alternative publication, the Oklahoma Gazette.)

"This report shows that more than 60 percent of U.S. corporations have been paying no corporate income tax from 1998 to 2005. Washington is giving million-dollar handshakes to big businesses, but they're giving working Oklahoma families the cold shoulder."—Andrew Rice

Under U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe’s watch, American corporations increasingly pay no income tax.

As energy companies report staggering profits and as the cost of living skyrockets for Oklahomans, the question becomes whether the Republican Inhofe, 73, has lost touch with the day-to-day economic struggles of the citizens he supposedly represents. The answer is obvious.

Inhofe, as the political saying goes, has absolutely “gone Washington,” which means he can no longer relate to hard-working people who are unable to afford basic medical care or college or groceries. He has lost empathy with regular families. This is not simple political hyperbole. Inhofe has bought into the ideology that corporations should come first, then regular citizens.

Unless they are ultra-rich, Oklahomans who vote for Inhofe are voting against themselves.

The General Accountability Office just released the report showing that more than 65% of foreign-owned U.S. corporations from 1998 to 2005 paid no income tax, with a high of 71.7% in 2001.

Andrew Rice, 35, the Oklahoma City Democrat running against Inhofe, was quick to point out after the report was released that the current Washington political establishment is failing Oklahoma families. This is a defining issue in the campaign, and voters should pay attention. The corporate media here will simply not report the truth or ignore it when it comes to Inhofe.

"This report shows that more than 60 percent of U.S. corporations have been paying no corporate income tax from 1998 to 2005,” Rice said. “Washington is giving million-dollar handshakes to big businesses, but they're giving working Oklahoma families the cold shoulder."

One of the major problems related to the issue, according to Rice, are U.S. tax laws that actually help companies that move overseas.

"Not only are most corporations not paying income tax, but multinational companies that relocate American jobs overseas don't have to pay taxes on the income that those foreign workers generate," Rice said. "Washington has to get its priorities straight. We should be granting tax breaks to companies that keep jobs right here on American soil."

Rice wants more accountability in Washington.

“There is clearly a lack of accountability in Washington, which is one of the main reasons I am running for the U.S. Senate," Rice said. "This is why we need a U.S. Senator who changes with the times and is not stuck in the partisan politics of the last 22 years."

Rice pointed out that Inhofe recently voted against the child tax credit for working families.

For years now, the Washington political establishment has ignored the basic interests of regular Americans and Oklahomans. Inhofe, a staunch supporter of energy and insurance companies, has turned his back on regular families. He continues to embarrass the state with his outrageous statements about global warming and cultural wedge issues.

The Oklahoma corporate media, especially The Oklahoman and its right-wing propagandist/reporter Christ Casteel, will not hold Inhofe accountable so many state residents have not tracked how our senior Senator has become a laughingstock on the world stage through the years.

What makes it worse is Inhofe’s actions show he cares nothing about the economic security of Oklahomans. As he embarrasses the state as an ambassador, he works against the interests of regular families here.

No one issue defines the difference between the state’s candidates for U.S. Senator this year more than how they approach the current health care crisis.

U.S. Sen. Inhofe, 73, has long been part of a federal legislative system that rewards insurance companies and health management organizations at the expense of ordinary Americans. Millions of Americans lack health insurance. Those Americans who have insurance face skyrocketing premiums, increased costs of co-payments and issues like “pre-existing” conditions. People often go without health care to pay other bills. Inhofe has sanctioned the current health care crisis with his votes, his lack of interest and Republican ideology.

State Sen. Andrew Rice, 35, the Democrat running against Inhofe, has proven he believes in a better health care system for Americans. We have seen this in his sponsorship and support of bills to require insurance companies to cover routine medial care for those undergoing clinical trials and medical costs associated with autism. We also know he has promised in his campaign repeatedly to use his position as U.S. Senator to work for an overall better health care system for Americans.

“"Every family, every child and every veteran should have access to the same health care options that taxpayers make available to members of Congress," Rice said recently. This is one of the great moral issues of our time."

It is hard to conceive of a person or voter—besides a very radical fringe of our culture—who truly does not see the current health care crisis as a moral issue. Certainly, there is room to argue over the exact approach to solving the health care crisis, but can any rational person believe the insurance companies will voluntary accept lower profits to help people? Our broken system calls for government intervention. The government intervenes if someone kills or physically hurts another person. This same intervention should apply to our health system. Even an increasing number of doctors in this country—some claim a clear majority—now believe we should have some type of universal health care program.

"Health insurance companies decline coverage for what they call 'pre-existing conditions,' and they retroactively deny treatment that has been 'pre-approved' to stick patients and doctors with the bill for treatment they had been told would be covered," Rice said. "In addition to providing all Oklahomans health insurance, I will stand up against insurance companies to ensure we have a Patient's Bill of Rights."

Inhofe, meanwhile, has consistently sided with insurance companies over ordinary Americans. He has voted 17 times against Medicare since 1995, according to Rice in earlier statement. Rice has also pointed out the Senator has accepted $342,166 in campaign donations from the insurance industry as well.

Most of those Oklahomans who support Inhofe in his reelection bid literally do so at the risk of their own health and the health of their children and grandchildren.

(Read "Inhofe sleaze at root of Roberts' woes?")

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, world famous for his controversial remarks about global warming, faces more problems in his reelection campaign than just low Republican voter turnout.

The 73-year-old Senator may face serious questions about his role in events leading to an ongoing lawsuit against Oral Roberts University in Tulsa and the resignation of the university’s former president, Richard Roberts.

Inhofe, along with U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, were recently listed as possible witnesses in the lawsuit brought by Tim and Paulita Brooker. The Brookers claim in the lawsuit that Roberts forced Tim Brooker’s ORU government class to help get Randi Miller elected as Tulsa mayor in 2006. This action, if true, could call into question the college’s nonprofit status.

Inhofe urged Miller, who lost the election and currently serves as a Tulsa County Commissioner, to run for mayor, according to The Tulsa World. Internal university emails, obtained by the newspaper, also show Roberts was urged by his sister-in-law Stephanie Cantees to thank Inhofe for assisting the university.

"Might want to in your thank you to Inhofe for his assistance in helping encourage usage of city plex for fema and any govt office," the email states. CityPLex, owned by the university, is an office building. Apparently the university sought Inhofe’s help in encouraging government agencies to rent space at CityPlex, according to the email.

Roberts, the son of televangelist Oral Roberts, was heavily criticized for his lavish lifestyle and administration of the university before he resigned.

It is unclear what Coburn’s testimony would reveal about his own relationship with the university. Several other notable people, including Miller, former Tulsa Mayor Bill LaFortune and former U.S. Reps. Bob Beauprez (Colorado) and James Traficant (Ohio) were also listed as witnesses.

The lawsuit, Miller’s public comments about Inhofe and how ORU students helped in her campaign and the email raise serious questions about Inhofe’s relationship with the beleaguered college.

Did Inhofe encourage the college to violate IRS rules about the political activities of nonprofit organizations? Did Inhofe seek out special favors for the college as it knowingly violated IRS rules?

Inhofe, who has embarrassed the state repeatedly with his bizarre comments that global warming is a political “hoax,” won Tuesday’s Republican primary. But low Republican voter turnout Tuesday—compared to the Democratic turnout—probably shows state voters lack enthusiasm for GOP candidates this year up and down the ticket, and that includes Inhofe. State Sen. Andrew Rice won the Democratic primary Tuesday handily but, according to conservative pundits, by-a-less-than-expected margin. He still faces a difficult battle against Inhofe, who has more campaign money.

John Wylie, pubisher of the Oologah Lake Leader, a newspaper located in the eastern part of the state, editorialized about Inhofe and the ORU controversy last November:

The heart of this scandal has never been Lindsay Roberts’ personal life or whether the Roberts enjoyed a lavish lifestyle at university expense while it careened towards financial ruin.

It is about the state and federal felonies of tax fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, violations of the RICO statutes and obstruction of justice.

Inhofe is almost certain to be deposed as civil and perhaps criminal probes move forward.

“What did you know and when did you know it?” are not questions any politician seeking reelection wants to answer under oath.